Lana Visser-Galant | 01 June 2026
Lana Visser-Galant is aan independent financial adviser who holds the Certified Financial Planner accreditation at Fiscal Private Clients.
When it comes to building wealth, one factor consistently outweighs all others: time. While income, investment choice, and market performance all play important roles, it is the number of years your money is invested that ultimately has the greatest impact.
Starting to invest in your 20s fundamentally changes your financial trajectory because it allows you to fully harness the power of compound interest, a force that turns small, consistent contributions into substantial long-term wealth.
Compound interest is “interest on interest”. Instead of earning returns only on your original investment, you also earn returns on the growth that accumulates over time.
This creates a snowball effect: your money grows slowly at first, but as the base increases, the growth becomes exponential rather than linear. The key ingredient in this process is not necessarily how much you invest, but how long your money remains invested.
This is why starting early is so powerful. Even a modest investment made in your 20s
has decades to compound. For example, someone who invests consistently from age 25 may accumulate significantly more wealth than someone who starts at 35, even if the later investor contributes larger amounts. The difference lies in the lost compounding time, which cannot be recovered later. In practical terms, delaying by just ten years could result in hundreds of thousands of rands less at retirement.
The numbers speak for themselves – let’s assume Sam and Sam’s Bestie are both investing R500 a month. The difference is that Sam started at age 25 while Sam’s Bestie started at age 35. They are both invested to achieve an average annual return of 10 percent a year and their contributions do not escalate. Below are the amounts which Sam and Sam’s Bestie will have at retirement:
| THE POWER OF STARTING EARLY |
||
| Monthly contribution | R500 | R500 |
| Investment growth | 10% a year | 10% a year |
| Time invested | 40 years | 30 years |
| Capital at retirement | R2 921 111 | R1 085 661 |
| The difference | R1 835 450 | |
| Source: www.smartaboutmoney.co.za | ||
That’s a difference of R1 835 450 which just 10 years makes. That’s more than what Sam’s Bestie would have, which shows that the first 10 years of Sam’s investment gave her more than half of the capital she would retire with. The additional ten-year period does not simply add more contributions; it multipliesthe entire growth process.
Another perspective highlights just how dramatic this difference can become over longer periods. Starting at age 20 instead of 40, with the same annual contributions, can lead to more than five times the total accumulated wealth by retirement.
This is not because the early investor saved drastically more money, but because their investments had twice as long to compound.
Time, therefore, acts as a multiplier. Each year your investments remain in the market increases the base on which future returns are earned. Missing early years means missing entire cycles of growth. At an average return of six to seven percent, investments tend to double approximately every ten years, meaning that starting earlier allows for multiple doubling periods that late starters simply cannot replicate.
Beyond the mathematics, starting in your 20s also changes behaviour and financial outcomes in meaningful ways. It encourages disciplined saving habits early in life and reduces the pressure to save aggressively later. In fact, those who develop savings
habits early on are more likely to manage the pressure of increased living costs, emergency circumstances, and have greater flexibility in achieving their goals.
Importantly, early investing also allows investors to take advantage of market volatility rather than fear it. With a long-term investment horizon, short-term market fluctuations become less significant, as there is more time for investments to recover and grow. Over decades, markets have historically trended upward, rewarding those who remain invested rather than those who attempt to time entry and exit points.
The difference between starting in your 20s and waiting until your 30s or 40s is not incremental, it is transformational. The earlier you begin, the more your money works
for you, often to a degree that seems disproportionate to the effort or capital invested. Small amounts, invested consistently and early, can outperform much larger sums invested later.
The conclusion is both simple and powerful: when it comes to investing, time is your greatest asset. Starting in your 20s does not just improve your financial outcome - it changes what is possible altogether.
Why is compound interest so important in investing?
Why must my investment beat inflation?
Why it is best to ‘pay yourself first’?
Why procrastination costs you twice
The power of investing early and how to catch up if you are a late starter
What I wish I had known before my first payday
The worst investment decision you can make
The “quiet” financial wins: boring habits that outperform clever ideas
How much will my savings grow